Islamofacist Jihadists!
Across the sea, into the continents of old, halfway to the east there lies nations with which contact is infrequent, trade is light and our perspectives biased. This Middle East, as you might name it, has become a turbulent land in recent times. Terrorist organizations and insurgents seek to form regimes so unpleasant and oppressive that few could survive under its harsh laws. They innocuously named it Islamism. Religion controlling the state; a form of government apparently baffling to Americans.
Yet, on the very podiums upon which candidates speak of freedom and justice, American politicians are the same who bring God into the daily discussions of lawmaking. The hallowed halls of the United States government are abound with references to God, not only for the mere symbolism but in earnest belief that it is integral to government. In the same country that speaks out fear against Islamism the constituents demand Christianism.
History has shown us time and again that human institutions holding to the belief that they are the manifestations of God's work are dangerous. The rise of secular government came about because the ability to question authority leads us to a society wherein which individuals need not fear the institution. Instead, questioning leads to a liberal and free society.
These governments as one may state, are two sides of the same coin, leading to oppression and authoritative regimes. The construction of this religious paradigm threatens the very basis of thought and expression. A people can be religious but a state cannot.
Ultrapunk
2 Comments:
A state can not be religious because of what religon stands for.Religion is about hope and belief.You can not run a country on that ,for to make a state run there most be action.To have a little of religion can be benefical to some people.This can be used to raise patriotism and hope for a better life in ones country.This can also be just as dangerous because it can make religious zealot.We must be tolerant of others belief despite of are own personal feelings and beliefs.Then will only religion not cause so many problems into todays world. Religion should be left out of the state decesions and kept to hard facts to run the state in the best possible way.
By
Anonymous, at 10:43 AM
I'm going to agree with most of this, though i am Christan myself i do not think having as i would say: An "Extremist Government" in charge... Salem witch trails seem familiar?
honestly yags seems pretty straight on in his response. An obvious example is Iran if you've been listening to the news you know whats happening. an extremist of any kind in charge of a country, state or province isn't good not just of religion of atheists (if they were indeed extreme and hold a hatred for religion for example: check out the guy who started an atheist jihad very stupid term i know its on you tube.)can be bad to. balance and acceptance is a key role in society i don't think Christ hated other religions, peoples & cultures so why would we. so overall i think i am agreeing with the most part of your statement.
i hope i didn't divert too far from the subject. yours truly echoz12
By
Anonymous, at 11:13 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home